{"id":74,"date":"2012-08-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-08-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trangwebvang.net\/lawpage\/2012\/08\/29\/lawyers-tell-china-to-be-responsible\/"},"modified":"2019-08-21T11:54:13","modified_gmt":"2019-08-21T11:54:13","slug":"lawyers-tell-china-to-be-responsible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/lawyers-tell-china-to-be-responsible\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyers tell China to be responsible"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Viet Nam Bar Federation has released a statement opposing China's violation of international laws through the establishment of the so-calledSanshaCity, which comprisesViet Nam's Hoang Sa (Paracel) and Truong Sa (Spratly) archipelagoes.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

“Viet Nam has full legal and historical evidence to assert its indisputable sovereignty over the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes.China's decision to establish the so-called Sansha city infringesViet Nam's territorial sovereignty over the archipelagoes and seriously violates basic principles of international law and the United Nations Charter,” says the federation statement.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

The federation also strongly condemns and opposes the invitation for bids for nine lots in theEastSea by the Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC).<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

It said these lots were situated withinViet Nam's exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, about 13 nautical miles fromViet Nam's Phu Quy island at the closest point and about 60 nautical miles fromViet Nam's shore.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

The statement said China's action seriously infringed Viet Nam's sovereign and jurisdictional rights over the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf as stated in Articles 55, 56, 57, 76 and 77 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

It also was contrary to the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the East Sea (DOC) reached among the g overnments of the ASEAN nations andChina, said the statement.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

The Viet Nam Bar Federation demands thatChina immediately abolish the decision to set up the so-called Sansha city and its wrongful invitation for bids, adding that it completely supports the statements released by the Foreign Ministry spokesperson on June 21 and 26 on these issues.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

The federation saidChina must respect and strictly implement its commitments as specified in the DOC.<\/span><\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

It also called onChina, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, to behave in a responsible manner and in line with the UN Charter and international laws, especially the UNCLOS 1982.<\/font><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Source: VNA\/VNS<\/font><\/span><\/em><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Viet Nam Bar Federation has released a statement opposing China's violation of international laws through the establishment of the so-calledSanshaCity, which comprisesViet Nam's Hoang Sa (Paracel) and Truong Sa (Spratly) archipelagoes.   “Viet Nam has full legal and historical evidence to assert its indisputable sovereignty over the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa archipelagoes.China's decision […]\n","protected":false},"author":78,"featured_media":75,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latest-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/78"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawpage.vn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}